作者:

葉俊顯 、 林桓億 、 許聖章 、 溫芳宜 、 田君美 、 劉柏定 、 劉哲良楊晴雯許仁弘 、 蔡岡翰 、 鄭向農


公開日期:

2019/12


類型:

研究報告


摘要:

在現代科技與社會溝通方式的快速轉變下,農政單位施行農業政策涉及更加廣泛的社會層面與利益攸關族群,因此需建立有效的意見回饋與政策效果評估機制,透過評估成果的回饋對政策提出檢討,以建構更佳的政策內容與推動方案。目前我國雖具有意見回饋管道及政策評估案例,但多半是對個別方案的深度評估,對於整體農業政策而言,仍缺乏系統性分析架構及對應之評估機制。 有鑑於此,本研究透過國內外農業政策評估文獻綜整,如歐盟對於農業共同政策的監測與評估架構之探討,以及訪查韓國農村經濟研究院(Korea Rural Economic Institute, KREI)並參酌其評估經驗,檢視我國農業發展與政策方向,藉以建構適用於我國之農業政策評估架構。此外,本研究以「推動農業保險」以及「養豬產業發展沼氣回收再利用」做為個案主題,釐清上述兩項政策之政策邏輯,並且進行意見蒐集與評估工作初探,以驗證本研究建構之農業政策評估架構之可行性。本研究期望透過農業政策評估架構之建置,為不同層級的農業政策目標釐清其政策邏輯,並提出農業政策評估計畫之內涵、羅列適當的政策評估工具與程序,使得政策評估成果得以讓利害關係人及政策制定者深入了解政策執行成效,進一步回饋於政策檢討與施政調整,提升農業治理效率。
With rapid changes in modern technology and global economy, agricultural policies involve a wider range of social dimensions and stakeholder groups. The evaluation of agricultural policies in Taiwan usually involves in-depth studies for a specific policy projects. However, there is a lack of a systematic assessment framework for agricultural policy. Thus it is necessary to establish a mechanism for policy evaluation to ensure the evaluation activities are implemented properly and effectively. This study reviews the experience of agricultural policy assessments in the EU and South Korea, and builds an agricultural policy assessment framework suitable for Taiwan. The information of EU agricultural policy evaluation framework is from EU’s publication, such as technical handbook or guidelines. As for the material of Korea's agricultural policy framework, it comes from the information gathered from our visit to Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI). Additionally, two case studies (“agricultural insurance policies” and “Green Power in Pig Farms”) are employed to verify the feasibility of our evaluation framework. Through the establishment of an agricultural policy evaluation framework, this study would like to clarify the policy logic for different levels of agricultural policy objectives, and proposes the elements included in the agricultural policy evaluation system, so that the evaluation results can provide a feedback loop (policy cycle) and improve the efficiency of agricultural governance.